Rental Assistance Capital Model
Incremental impact of HB 1336-FN on private charitable deposit-assistance capital over a 10-year horizon. Baseline: do nothing (deposits funded as one-way grants). Policy: HB 1336-FN passes (deposit + RCD where needed, both refundable to the third-party payor and recycled). Every input is editable; everything recomputes live.
Inputs — Funding & Deployment
Recovery Rate — Anchored to TransUnion Tiers
Credit Tier Population Mix
TransUnion ResidentScore eviction rates by credit tier. Edit the population mix to match the served population.
| Tier | Eviction rate | Pop. mix |
|---|---|---|
| 350–449 | 12.3% | |
| 450–499 | 9.4% | |
| 500–549 | 5.8% | |
| 550–649 | 1.3% | |
| 650–749 | 0.3% | |
| Total (must equal 100%) | 100% | |
Results — 10-Year Horizon
Cumulative Households Over 10 Years
HB 1336 starts behind do-nothing in years 1–L (here L = average tenancy) because the first cohort's deposits haven't returned yet. Once recycling begins, the curves cross and HB 1336 pulls ahead.
Annual Placements Per Year
Households placed in each year. The HB 1336 program runs below the grant baseline during the initial outlay period, then steps up as each cohort’s refunds return for redeployment (at years L+1, 2L+1, …).
Year-by-Year
| Year | HB 1336 Capital Deployed |
HB 1336 Households |
HB 1336 Cumulative |
Do Nothing Households |
Do Nothing Cumulative |
Year Delta (HB 1336 − Do Nothing) |
Year Delta % (vs. Do Nothing) |
Cumulative Delta (HB 1336 − Do Nothing) |
Cumulative Delta % (vs. Do Nothing) |
|---|
"Year Delta" is the per-year placement difference (negative early, positive after the crossover). "Cumulative Delta" tracks the running total — this is the bottom-line incremental impact at any horizon. The % columns express each delta relative to the do-nothing baseline; green is favorable, red unfavorable.
Scenario Comparison: HB 1336 vs. the Do-Nothing Baseline
Each row below is a different combination of recovery rate r and the share of households needing an RCD. The first row is the do-nothing baseline (current law). The highlighted "current inputs" row uses whatever you've set above. The remaining rows stress-test the conclusion against more pessimistic combinations.
| Scenario | Households / 10 yrs | vs. Do Nothing | % vs. Baseline |
|---|
Sensitivity Heatmap: Households Served Over 10 Years Under HB 1336
Rows vary the share of households needing an RCD; columns vary the recovery rate. All cells hold tenancy L, deposit size, RCD multiple, inflow, and overhead at the values you've set above. Green cells exceed the do-nothing baseline; red cells fall below it. The only region where HB 1336 underperforms do-nothing is the lower-left corner — simultaneously high RCD demand and low recovery.